PoS - Proceedings of Science
Volume 301 - 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017) - Session Cosmic-Ray Indirect. CRI-properties of CRs at high energies (anisotropy, energy, mass)
Reducing the model dependence in the cosmic ray composition interpretation of $X_{max}$ distributions
J. Bellido,* S. Blaess, B. Dawson
*corresponding author
Full text: pdf
Pre-published on: August 16, 2017
Published on: August 03, 2018
At higher energies the uncertainty in the estimated cosmic ray mass composition, extracted from the observed distributions of the depth of shower maximum $X_{\mathrm{max}}$, is dominated by uncertainties in the hadronic interaction models. Thus, the estimated composition depends strongly on the particular model used for its interpretation. To reduce this model dependency in the interpretation of the mass composition, we have developed a novel approach which involves fitting some of the model parameters to the data. Using this approach we extracted cosmic ray mass composition information from the published Pierre Auger $X_{\mathrm{max}}$ distributions. We have obtained a consistent mass composition interpretation for EPOS-LHC and QGSJetII-04. The Sibyll2.3 model provides two possible composition interpretations, one of them in agreement with EPOS-LHC and QGSJetII-04. Our fit suggests a composition dominated by protons below $10^{18.5}$ eV, while between $10^{18.5}$ and $10^{19.4}$ eV it becomes dominated by helium, and in the two energy bins above $10^{19.4}$ eV a growing nitrogen component is hinted. The fit also suggests that the normalisation level for $\langle X_{\mathrm {max}}\rangle$ is consistent with the QGSJetII-04 model prediction, but the normalization level for $\sigma(X_{\mathrm max})$ is consistent with the EPOS-LHC prediction. These results remain sensitive to the other model parameters that we keep fixed, such as the <Xmax> elongation rate and the $\langle X_{\mathrm {max}}\rangle$ separation between p and Fe.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/1.301.0490
How to cite

Metadata are provided both in "article" format (very similar to INSPIRE) as this helps creating very compact bibliographies which can be beneficial to authors and readers, and in "proceeding" format which is more detailed and complete.

Open Access
Creative Commons LicenseCopyright owned by the author(s) under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.