Best Practices for the Manufacture of Antimatter Atoms
E. Hunter*,
M. Bumbar,
C. Amsler,
M. Bayo,
H. Breuker,
M. Cerwenka,
G. Costantini, R. Ferragut, M. Giammarchi, A. Gligorova, G. Gosta, H. Higaki, C. Killian, V. Kraxberger, N. Kuroda, A. Lanz, M. Leali, G. Maero, C. Malbrunot, V. Mascagna, Y. Matsuda, S. Migliorati, D. Murtagh, A. Nanda, L. Nowak, M. Romé, R. Sheldon, M.C. Simon, M. Tajima, V. Toso, S. Ulmer, L. Venturelli, A. Weiser, E. Widmann and Y. Yamazakiet al. (click to show)*: corresponding author
Pre-published on:
March 17, 2025
Published on:
—
Abstract
We present a pulsed "e+kick" scheme for removing ions from a positron plasma, along with other plasma routines used by the ASACUSA-Cusp Collaboration for making antihydrogen in 2023 and 2024. We also report on selected antimatter mixing experiments from 2023. Antiprotons are introduced into a plasma of $4\times 10^6$ positrons with variable RF heating and mixing speed. The effects of these variables on antihydrogen yield are interpreted in a way that is consistent with theoretical predictions. Our observations provide general guidance for stable antihydrogen production in Penning-Malmberg traps.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/1.480.0021
How to cite
Metadata are provided both in
article format (very
similar to INSPIRE)
as this helps creating very compact bibliographies which
can be beneficial to authors and readers, and in
proceeding format which
is more detailed and complete.