Volume 508 - QCD at the Extremes (QCDEX2025) - Session: Parton Densities and TMDs at low scales, including saturation and recombination.
A phenomenological study of the proton charm and beauty content in the $k_t$-factorization formalism using KMR and MRW unintegrated parton distribution functions
O.Β Naeimeh* and M.Β Modarres
*: corresponding author
Pre-published on: November 19, 2025
Published on: β€”
Abstract
In this paper, we study the phenomenology of the charm and beauty content of the proton within
the π‘˜π‘‘ -factorization formalism, using the integral version of the Kimber-Martin-Ryskin (𝐾𝑀𝑅)
and Martin-Ryskin-Watt (π‘€π‘…π‘Š) unintegrated parton distribution functions (π‘ˆπ‘ƒπ·πΉ) together
with the angular ordering constraint (𝐴𝑂𝐢). For this purpose, the reduced beauty cross section
πœŽπ‘Β―
𝑏
red (π‘₯,𝑄2) and the charm and beauty structure functions πΉπ‘žπ‘žΒ―
2 (π‘₯,𝑄2) (π‘ž = 𝑐, 𝑏) are calculated by
the π‘˜π‘‘ -factorization formalism using 𝐾𝑀𝑅 and π‘€π‘…π‘Š approaches and the 𝑀𝑀𝐻𝑇2014-𝑃𝐷𝐹 set
as input. Recently, Guiot and van Hameren demonstrated that the upper limit π‘˜max of the transverse momentum
integration in the π‘˜π‘‘ -factorization formalism should be approximately equal to 𝑄, the
hard scale, to avoid overestimating the proton structure function. In the present work, we show
that this condition (π‘˜max = 𝑄) is not valid in the low and moderate energy regions. Furthermore,
by considering both gluon and quark contributions at the same perturbative order and employing a
physical gauge for the gluon, i.e., π΄πœ‡π‘žβ€²
πœ‡ = 0, in the calculation of πΉπ‘žπ‘žΒ―
2 within the π‘˜π‘‘ -factorization
formalism, we do not encounter any overestimation of the theoretical predictions for different
choices of π‘˜max > 𝑄. Finally, the computed values of the reduced beauty cross section, πœŽπ‘Β―π‘red ,
and the charm and beauty structure functions, πΉπ‘žπ‘žΒ―2 , are compared with the experimental data of the π‘πΈπ‘ˆπ‘† and 𝐻1 collaborations in 𝐻𝐸𝑅𝐴 and theoretical predictions. In general, the results
obtained from both the 𝐾𝑀𝑅 and π‘€π‘…π‘Š methods are in perfect agreement with the experimental
and theoretical predictions, especially at high energies, but the 𝐾𝑀𝑅 framework is better consistent
with the experimental data and theoretical predictions than the π‘€π‘…π‘Š framework at the low and
moderate energies.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/1.508.0013
How to cite

Metadata are provided both in article format (very similar to INSPIRE) as this helps creating very compact bibliographies which can be beneficial to authors and readers, and in proceeding format which is more detailed and complete.

Open Access
Creative Commons LicenseCopyright owned by the author(s) under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.